Friday, March 26, 2010

post-midreview evaluation

here is a list of bulletins regarding my mid-review critique:
  • syntactical thinking/investigation
  • a priori formal vocabulary
  • suppresses authorship
  • eschews criticism
  • anticipation of animation
  • define where/how the sneeze works: what gets sneezed is not formal
  • drawing idea: what might get sneezed in, let the sneeze create the form
  • what is the marble? people, sneeze, exhibits
  • spectrum developed from the sneeze
  • 2 problems with syntactical thinking: resistances and when to stop
  • constantly rethinking/remaking itself (cedric prices' fun palace)
in addition, thanks to chelsea i got an abundant of notes too!
  • syntactical thinking is formalism in eisenman's world: belief that analysis will provide design strategy, formal vocabulary established prior
  • suppresses forms of authorship: similar to parametric modeling...inserted parameters and out comes form, when really you choose the form
  • representations: what if the house did what representations did?
  • assuming formal a priori...look at animation...sneeze sliver site/site accepts sneeze
  • what is the marble being replaced with?
  • amy kulper: marble should be what gets sneezed, what gets sneezed should not be formal, what gets sneezed from where?
  • meredith miller: how desires of different occupants transform sneeze, marble as other non-people things
  • Exert authorship by virtue of these things (sneeze)
  • Marc Wigley - constants new babylon: shadows of people finding new desires

No comments:

Post a Comment